My Rating System and Review Criteria

My reviews focus on aspects that go beyond commercial success to the core of musical experience. That's why they are based on a set of personal criteria, reflecting an engagement with music as both an art form and a personal experience. Below is an outline of the the grading system and criteria I use to evaluate albums. It's not objective, and not meant to be.

Grading System

My grading system ranges from 1 to 10, allowing for nuanced distinctions between albums:

Review Criteria

  1. Emotional Resonance: The capacity of the music to evoke emotions, with a higher score for albums that connect on a deeper emotional level.
  2. Innovation and Originality: Albums that introduce new ideas, sounds, or challenge genre boundaries receive higher scores.
  3. Cohesion and Flow: The album's ability to present a unified narrative or mood throughout its duration, creating a seamless listening experience.
  4. Lyrical Depth: The substance and impact of the album's lyrics, including storytelling, thematic depth, and poetic quality.
  5. Replay Value: Albums that remain engaging and reveal new layers upon repeated listens score higher in this category.
  6. Personal Connection: This subjective measure considers how the album relates to personal experiences or moments, recognizing that music's impact can vary greatly among listeners.
  7. Artistic Integrity: The authenticity of the album and the sincerity of its artistic expression, valuing genuine creativity over commercial appeal.

Application in Reviews

In each review, albums are evaluated based on the above criteria, with the final score reflecting a holistic view of the album's artistic value, emotional impact, and innovation. The goal is to provide a comprehensive analysis that aids in discovering music that resonates on a personal level, beyond mainstream appeal.

View my reviews here

← anonymous kudos